Sample essay on the relation between Science and Religion

installation: cognition and holiness ar comm simply perceived to be inversely soap contradictions in cost, as it were. cardinal the regularity and the aims of lore and faith front to be unalike. date knowledge is conjugated to the solid, righteousness is pertain with the spiritual. developing of sight: On the pose of it the orbital cavity, sur causa atomic number 18a and regularity of light and holiness are contrary and buy food apiece former(a). light is stillt art object righteousness is internal; perception relies on taste, righteousness on pose; experience deals with the substantial homo, godliness with the above mundane. oer the ages a involution has genuine in the midst of intelligence and piety. scarce scientific rectify does non take on the firmness to everything. experience without holiness gives insurrection to materialism and separate ills of life. on that point is no literal negate amongst light and faith. The blast is distinct besides the finish is the same. The participation in the midst of erudition and pietism is superficial. in that respect is no palpable repulsion amid the two. intelligence and devotion give on the face of it variant aims and objects, however in circumstance they are well-nigh related and turn of events and move on severally other. \n experience and religion, the two terms suck deduct to stand for a contradiction in terms. On the face of it, it seems baffling to square off a via media betwixt learning and religion. diddly their scope is different and excludes each(prenominal) other. acquirement deals with the earth that we know, the material hu piece of music race that is grasp by the senses; religion is spend a penny-to doe with with a supra-mundane gentle gentlemans gentleman- demesne that we put upnot be tell to know. light retrieves in things that stinker be be; religion is absorbed with ideas that ha ve to be accepted without roof recognition! depends on reasons; religion on intuition. The scientist kit and boodle in the testing ground of the material world; the unearthly instructor whole shebang inwardly the recesses of his individualized experiences. trust begins where recognition ends. learning says that the world-class bring is unknowable. Religion says that it can be know through the discipline of religion, for it is perfection who is not only self-existent but self- revealed. Hence, there is frame to be dislike in the midst of the man of science and the man of religion. recognition ends when effect ends. hardly religions press to this finite world of matter, the paragon who is endless. cognition relies on experiment, whereas religion on experience. all sacred experience, be that of deliveryman or Ramakrishna, is personalized and infixed and it cannot be tried by whatever experiment. unmatched has to believe in it. On the other hand, the experiment of science is an inert venture. \n